Drawing for SUPREMACY CLASS

USPTO serial 87489817

SUPREMACY CLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPREMACY CLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greene

Jeffrey H. Greene Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ste. 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for constructing, analyzing and running quantum programs, quantum algorithms, and quantum instruction language; downloadable computer software for quantum programming and developing and testing quantum algorithms; downloadable computer software for quantum computing; downloadable computer software for developing quantum virtual machines (QVM); computer hardware; computer hardware for quantum programming and quantum computing; Electronic components in the nature of microwave and radio frequency (RF) components, namely, cables, attenuators, circulators, and isolatorsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring open source software and programming language for constructing, analyzing and running quantum programs and quantum algorithms; cloud computing featuring software for use in quantum programming and quantum computing; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in quantum programming and developing and testing quantum algorithms; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring open source software for developing and testing quantum algorithms; design and development of computer software; development of technologies for the fabrication of chips and circuits for quantum programming and quantum computing; technology consultation and research in the field of quantum computing, quantum programming, quantum engineering, quantum algorithms and cryogenics; Computer hardware developmentACTIVE—
045Licensing of intellectual propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 31, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance