Drawing for TRUELAYER

USPTO serial 87495656

TRUELAYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRUELAYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Hanson

Kevin Hanson Haley Guiliano International LLP26-28 Bedford Row. 2nd FloorLondon, WC1R4HEUNITED KINGDOM

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software development kits (SDK); Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable middleware for authorization of access to data; Downloadable middleware for authentication to authorize access to dataACTIVEJun 10, 2021
036Financial information; Financial information processing; Financial information provided by electronic means; Financial research and information services; Providing financial information; Providing financial information services to banks; Providing financial information services to lendors; Providing financial information services to customers; Providing financial information via a web siteACTIVEJun 10, 2021
042Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for customers for sharing confidential information with a financial institution; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for content providers for sharing confidential information between an owner of the information and a requestor of the information; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for access to financial data; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for access to protected data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable middleware for providing an interface between lendor software and bank software; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable middleware for providing an interface between customer software and content provider softwareACTIVEJun 10, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2021SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 12, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 12, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 7, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance