USPTO serial 87496064
BIZTANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIZTANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Friedman
Daniel J. Friedman Cohen Tauber Spievack & Wagner P.C.420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 420420 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10170Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed media, namely, magazine publications and articles related to startup companies and business advice, printed media, namely, magazine publications and articles aimed at connecting buyers and sellers of financial assets; printed media, namely, magazine publications and articles providing financial insight for startup companies and potential investors | ACTIVE | Apr 13, 2016 |
| 036 | Financial intermediary services, namely, a service platform that facilitates the connection between startup companies and potential investors; financial advisory and consultancy services relating to micro credits, micro finance and technology products; Financial services, namely, business fundraising for others; Financial information and evaluations; Financial research and information services | ACTIVE | Apr 13, 2016 |
| 041 | Providing training and information to entrepreneurs related to micro credits, micro financing and technology products. Hosting of seminars and round tables related to business fundraising for purposes of informing and educating entrepreneurs. Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable videos featuring start-up businesses pitches to potential investors | ACTIVE | Apr 13, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |