Drawing for PICASSO

USPTO serial 87497114

PICASSO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PICASSO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Murray

PETER D. MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric kitchen appliances, namely, slicers, food choppers, blenders, juicers, food processors, mixers, toasters, ovens, cookers, slow cookers, pressure cookers, grills, including indoor grills, panini presses, pasta machines, waffle maker, ice cream maker, popcorn maker, fryers, woks, skillets, dehydrator, sparkling water machine, egg cooker, crepe maker, yogurt maker, bread makerACTIVE—
021Non-electric slicers, food choppers; food mixers; juicers; cooking utensils, namely, spoons, fork and spatula, ladle, rolling pans, spatulas, whisks, kitchen thermometer, holders; hand operated salsa maker; colander; handheld multi-purpose kitchen utensil, namely, combination stirring whisk and serving tongs; non-electric cookware, namely, pots, pans, steamers, cooking strainers, aluminum and copper infused ceramic pans, baking pans, frying pan, baking sheets and trays; microwave bacon tray, microwavable hot plate; wok; non electric pancake flipping pan, grill pan; non electric sandwich press, non electric panini maker, omelette maker; cookware for use in microwave ovens, namely, ceramic warming and cooking plates; stove top oven; non-heat transmitting fiber glass wool liner used during cooking to keep oven, stove, bakeware, countertop or food preparation surface clean; plastic storage containers, trays used to store tableware and kitchenware, molded plastic trays for the storage of foods; organizers and storage bins, plastic splatter coversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 10, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance