Drawing for APOLLO

USPTO serial 87497656

APOLLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with APOLLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tye Biasco

TYE BIASCO PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN PA80TH SOUTH 8TH STREET 4800 IDS CENTERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated hoists for theaters, arenas, and stagesABANDONED—
009Computer operated electronic controllers for hoist and rigging systems for theaters, arenas, and stages; computerized controllers for hoistsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 1, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 17, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance