Drawing for SPOONFULONE

USPTO serial 87497671

SPOONFULONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOONFULONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica L. Rothstein

JESSICA L. ROTHSTEIN GOODWIN620 EIGHTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029yogurt, fruit pureesACTIVE—
030breakfast cereals, cookies and candyACTIVE—
032fruit-based beverages; vegetable-based beverages, namely, vegetable drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 19, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance