USPTO serial 87501022
DYNAMIC MICROLEARNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEYIGA, ADETAYO JANET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC MICROLEARNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cedar Rapids, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM C RAVA
WILLIAM C RAVA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing on-line instruction in the form of non-downloadable short training videos on various subjects critical to job performance to adults in the field of financial institutions | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |