Drawing for THE TRAINING ARCADE

USPTO serial 87504736

THE TRAINING ARCADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE TRAINING ARCADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Sennott

Paul Sennott SENNOTT & WILLIAMS, LLP90 CANAL STREETBOSTON, MA 02114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) software, namely, electronic game software, training game software, and software for assessment and analytics of game resultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 23, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 11, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 22, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance