USPTO serial 87507572
ILTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Smith
JEFFREY SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless access hardware used to transmit and receive digital data from fixed to mobile terminals located in the remote and rugged areas; High-speed wireless communication system comprised of computer hardware and software for connecting machine-to-machine (M2M) and Internet of Things (IoT) communications; computer software platforms for connecting, transmitting, and integrating wired telecommunications networks with wireless telecommunications for the purpose of extending high speed wired network; digital telephone platforms for extending high speed wired networks to wireless communications networks; network management software platform for high-speed wireless transport of voice, data, video and Internet of things (IoT) from fixed to mobile terminals located in the remote and rugged areas; network management software for high-speed remote wireless data collection for use by oil and gas companies, military, first responders, law enforcement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |