USPTO serial 87508037
POLYGRAPH ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYGRAPH ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Anderson
STEPHEN ANDERSON ANDERSON LAW - WE PROTECT IMAGINATION31285 TEMECULA PKWY, SUITE 240TEMECULA, CA 92592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Anti-piracy software; Computer application software for risk management and risk mitigation, namely, software for detecting and mitigating against HTTP or HTTPS borne threats to computer networks, web servers, computer peripherals and electronic components, enterprise systems and proprietary data; Computer programs for detecting and mitigating against HTTP or HTTPS borne threats to computer networks, web servers, computer peripherals and electronic components, enterprise systems and proprietary data; Computer software and firmware for monitoring, analyzing or reporting of network information, data and traffic; Computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Computer software for the creation of firewalls; Computer software for computer networks, web servers, electronic components and enterprise systems, namely, software for monitoring electronic traffic and detecting potential threats to network security | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |