Drawing for HEALER'S

USPTO serial 87509231

HEALER'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALER'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas TDFoster - Intellectual Property Law Foster

Thomas TDFoster - Intellectual Property Law Foster TDFOSTER - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW11622 EL CAMINO REAL STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for therapeutic purposes; Medicinal drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2019INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 12, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 9, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 6, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance