Drawing for MONSTER MEAL DEAL

USPTO serial 87509722

MONSTER MEAL DEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER MEAL DEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane M. Reed

DIANE M. REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Hot dogs; hamburger; french fries; potato chips; salads, namely, garden salads, fruit salads, vegetable salads, and salads featuring meat, fish, or poultry; combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetablesACTIVE—
030Tacos; hot dog sandwiches; hamburger sandwiches; sandwiches; pasta salad; combination meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice-based entrees and soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or riceACTIVE—
032Non alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, soft drinks, sports drinks, fruit juice drinks, and flavored waterACTIVE—
043Restaurant services; bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance