USPTO serial 87511261
PLUTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLUTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Wright
AMY L WRIGHT TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLPONE INDIANA SQUARESUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |