USPTO serial 87512275
TANBARK MILL VINEYARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5457317Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANBARK MILL VINEYARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
St. Helena, CA
Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
St. Helena, CA
Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
St. Helena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Cadwell
JEFFREY R. CADWELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine; alcoholic beverages, except beer | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 30, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Long Meadow Ranch Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TANBARK MILL VINEYARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 1, 2019 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |