USPTO serial 87512620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Kozak
LORI KOZAK FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE BLDG. 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuits; application specific integrated circuits; programmable integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules for touch screen controllers and for proximity sensor controllers; proximity sensors; software for running, programming and controlling integrated circuits and integrated circuit modules; computer operating software for integrated circuits and modules for touch screen controllers and for proximity sensor controllers; graphical user interface software for touch screens and for proximity sensors; computer interface software for touch-sensitive or proximity-sensitive computer screens and displays; computer operating software for touch-sensitive or proximity-sensitive computer screens and displays; computer chips; semiconductors; computer operating software; electronic controllers for touch screens; electronic proximity sensors and switches; Electronic touch sensitive switches; Proximity sensors; Touch pads; Touch panels; Touch screens; Touchscreen monitors; Touchscreen sensors; Protective covers and cases for cell phones, laptops and portable media players; liquid crystal displays, video screens, computer touchscreens for mobile telephones, televisions, PCs, tablets, in-vehicle infotainment systems; gesture sensors for in-vehicle infotainment systems and for automatically opening vehicle doors; Integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits, programmable integrated circuits, and integrated circuit modules for detecting driver interaction with a steering wheel; Integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits, programmable integrated circuits, and integrated circuit modules for illuminating portions of a steering wheel | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |