USPTO serial 87513395
VISIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOX III, LYAL L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica Riva Talley
LAURIEL F DALIER STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC1100 NEW YORK AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission and streaming of voice, video, data, images and multimedia content by wireless communications networks and the Internet; providing multiple user access to a wireless communications network and the Internet; and wireless communications services, namely, wireless telecommunications service plans featuring voice, text, email, messaging and data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |