Drawing for RIOUS

USPTO serial 87514577

RIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair; hair extensions; hair weaves; wig caps; hair pieces; hair weft in the nature of weft hair extensions; braidsABANDONEDNov 8, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 20, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 20, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2018LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 13, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance