USPTO serial 87514724
CARNIVAL EATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARNIVAL EATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Queen Creek, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Craig Johanson
JUSTIN CRAIG JOHANSON GRIFFITHS & SEATON3813 E KENWOOD ST19541 EAST VIA PARK STREETMESA, AZ 85215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Cooking instruction; Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of recipes, cooking, blogging, and related information; Entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park show; Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing reality based television program; Entertainment services in the nature of arranging social entertainment events; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, video and prose presentations featuring recipes, cooking, blogging, menus, food, and related information; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring recipes, cooking, blogging, menus, food, and related information; Entertainment services, namely, conducting carnivals; Entertainment services, namely, displaying a series of films; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of recipes, cooking, blogging, menus, food, and related information; Entertainment services, namely, wine and food tastings; Entertainment media production services for motion pictures, television and Internet; Providing continuing medical education courses; Providing continuing nursing education courses; Continuing education services, namely, providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the field of recipes, cooking, blogging, menus, food, and related information; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring recipes, cooking, blogging, and related information; Providing online non-downloadable journals in the field of recipes, cooking, blogging, and related information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |