USPTO serial 87516859
MIZU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIZU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
JONATHAN G. MORTON Morton & Associates LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE CONDUCT, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSFORMATION, ACCUMULATION, REGULATION OR CONTROL OF THE ELECTRIC CURRENT; APPARATUS FOR THE REGISTRATION, TRANSMISSION, REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGE; MAGNETIC REGISTRY SUPPORTS, ACOUSTIC DISCS; CDS, DVDS AND OTHER MEDIA OF DIGITAL REGISTRATION; MECHANISMS FOR PRE-PAYMENT APPLIANCES; REGISTERED BOXES, CALCULATION MACHINES, DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT; COMPUTERS; FIRE EXTINGUISHING DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WATER DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT; WATER HEATERS; STEAM BATHS, SAUNAS AND SPAS; WATER DISTRIBUTORS; AIR PURIFIERS FOR USE IN WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS; WATER REFRIGERATORS; CLEAN ROOMS; HEAT ACCUMULATORS; HEATING APPLIANCES; ELECTRICAL HEATING EQUIPMENT; HEATING EQUIPMENT FOR FOOD PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | VEHICLES AND MEANS OF TRANSPORT; VEHICLES AND MEANS OF LAND TRANSPORT; AIR AND SPACE VEHICLES; AQUATIC VEHICLES; VEHICLE BITS AND ACCESSORIES; WHEELS, TIRES AND LIZARDS; DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT ANTI-ROUB, PREVENTION AND SAFETY FOR VEHICLES; SPACES AND ACCESSORIES FOR AIR AND SPACE VEHICLES; PASTORS AND ACCESSORIES FOR AQUATIC VEHICLES; PEST AND ACCESSORIES FOR LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | WALKING BATS; TRAVEL ARTICLES; BAGGAGE ITEMS; BAGGAGE; TRAVEL LUGGAGE; BOLSAS; COSMETIC BAGS; LEATHER PURSES; TRAVEL BAGS; LEATHER BAGS AND WALLETS; LEATHER WALLETS; CARTEIRAS; WALL WRENCHES; TOILETTE SHAPES; LEATHER CASES; BASS; HAND WEARS; TRAVEL SUITCASES; TRAVEL SUITCASES AND SUITCASES; BACKPACKS; PASTAS; BAGS; IMITATIONS OF SKINS; ANIMAL SKIN; LEATHER IMITATION BOXES FOR HATS; ARREIOS; SEALING ARTICLES; RIDING WHIPS; ANIMAL COLLECTORS; Brakes; ANIMAL TRAINS; ANIMAL CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FASHION ONE (EUROPE) N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named MIZU
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |