Drawing for HOMESAVER

USPTO serial 87517361

HOMESAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMESAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. DuPre'

JOHN L. DUPRE' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROAD, P.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Operation of an incentive program whereby consumers and bank card holders make savings in relation to their utilities, telecommunication, home security, satellite television, and other service providers as a bill reduction service; administration of an incentive program whereby customers earn cashback, points or discounts from aforesaid service providers and additional retail merchants as a cash back serviceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 28, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 28, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jul 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 10, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance