USPTO serial 87519045
GO BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GO BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole J. Harrell
NICOLE J. HARRELL KAUFMAN & CANOLES150 WEST MAIN STREETP.O. BOX 3037NORFOLK, VA 23514-3037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a services (SAAS) featuring cloud computing software, operating software, and mobile applications for clinical and healthcare document management; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications for managing and maintaining electronic health records (EHR); cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications to support interoperability with other electronic health records (EHR) and information systems and communication and coordination with other healthcare providers; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications that perform clinical record keeping, electronic billing, business intelligence, business analysis, clinical outcomes and reporting functions and for accessing and conducting on-site and online training sessions associated therewith; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications for patient medical records management, viewing of patient medical charts, faxing and printing of patient medical records, managing tasks relating to patient clinical assessment, diagnosis and treatment and coordinating with other healthcare providers; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications for use by healthcare providers to schedule appointments, prescribe medications electronically and for clinical notes and managing tasks relating to caseload management; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications for use by patients to access their read-only medical records, receive appointment reminders, view billing records, pay invoices, request prescription refills and appointments, and communicate with their healthcare providers; cloud computing featuring software and mobile applications for accessing clinical medical assessment records and medical treatment plan libraries; information technology consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |