Drawing for ADP LABORHOOD

USPTO serial 87525825

ADP LABORHOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADP LABORHOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Hollander and Sharoni S. Finkelstein

SUSAN E. HOLLANDER AND SHARONI S. FINKELSTEIN VENABLE LLP101 California Street, Suite 3800San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation in the field of improving corporate culture, goal setting, and team building for the purpose of providing information to others in the fields of payroll, human resources, insurance compliance for business purposes, business risk management, employee incentive award programs to promote job safety, and personnel and employment recruiting; providing information about corporate cultureACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 26, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 9, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance