USPTO serial 87526453
REEFER MADNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REEFER MADNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan M. Harris
ALAN M HARRIS LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M HARRIS3278 WILSHIRE BLVD#901LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring bags and accessories, gifts not including beverageware or clothing, toys, games, novelties not including beverageware or clothing, paper goods, books, artwork and posters accessible by store, online, telephone, facsimile and mail order; on-line retail store services for works of art provided by art galleries | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |