USPTO serial 87528703
PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Hayes
KEVIN M HAYES KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLPONE WORLD TRADE CENTER STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204-2988Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Energy bars; energy chews; energy gummy; effervescent tablets for making a dietary supplement drink; supplement for boosting energy; supplement for boosting the body's production of nitric oxide; joint protection supplement; supplement for body fat reduction; powdered creatine; creatine capsules; creatine tablets; nutritional candy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |