Drawing for PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 87528703

PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Hayes

KEVIN M HAYES KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLPONE WORLD TRADE CENTER STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204-2988

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Energy bars; energy chews; energy gummy; effervescent tablets for making a dietary supplement drink; supplement for boosting energy; supplement for boosting the body's production of nitric oxide; joint protection supplement; supplement for body fat reduction; powdered creatine; creatine capsules; creatine tablets; nutritional candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 24, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 3, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2019CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 15, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 23, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 15, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 24, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 24, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance