USPTO serial 87529416
FASTERPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASTERPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Bobo
Megan Bobo Paymentwall, Inc.255 9th StreetSan Francisco, CA 94103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for transferring funds to and from others; authentication software for controlling access to and communication with computers and computer networks; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic payment transactions via a global communications network; computer software for identifying, evaluating, and reviewing individual payment methods as potentially fraudulent | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2010 |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, electronic funds transfer; financial services, namely, funding online cash accounts from prepaid cash cards, bank accounts, and credit card accounts; financial services, namely, providing online stored value accounts in an electronic environment; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global communications network; payment and funds verification services; providing electronic payment services involving transmissions of bill payment data conducted via a global communications network; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer by ACH, credit card, debit card, and electronic check; financial services, namely, providing electronic transfer of a virtual currency via a global communications network; financial services that allow consumers to securely conduct transactions with third parties; merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2010 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for transferring funds to and from others; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers and computer networks; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for allowing users to perform electronic transactions via a global communications network | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |