USPTO serial 87529668
SPACE ODYSSEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPACE ODYSSEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua A. Schaul
JOSHUA A SCHAUL SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26TH STREETSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programmes; Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Computer game programs; Computer game programs, cartridges, and cassettes; Computer game software; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Computer gaming software for recreational game playing purposes; Computer programs for video and computer games; Computer software, namely, game engine software for video game development and operation; Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable computer programs featuring positionable game piece figures for use in the field of computer games; Downloadable electronic game programs; Downloadable electronic game software for use on computers and mobile devices; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Interactive game programs; Interactive game software; Interactive multimedia computer game programs; Interactive video game programs; Programmable electronic controllers for computers and mobile devices; Recorded computer game programs; Video game discs; Video game software; Video and computer game programs; Virtual reality game software | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |