Drawing for P P

USPTO serial 87530861

P P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Kirkpatrick

RICHARD L. KIRKPATRICK PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 2824CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPARTMENTSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Packaged meal kits consisting of fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, fresh beans, fresh herbs, fresh nutsACTIVE—
030Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of pasta, and also including processed beans and processed nuts, sauces, and seasonings, ready for cooking and for purposes of being assembled as a meal; prepared food kits composed of pasta, and also including processed beans, processed nuts, sauces, and seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a mealACTIVE—
039Food deliveryACTIVE—
043Providing a website on global computer networks featuring information in the fields of food and beverage, namely, information about recipes, ingredients and cooking information; food preparation services featuring meat, poultry, cheese, pastas, rice, fruits, vegetables, seasonings or rice; providing a website on global computer networks featuring information in the fields of food preparation, cooking, recipes, ingredients and cookware techniques; Subscriber-based meal planning services in digital form, accessible through the Internet; consulting in the field of menu planning for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 1, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 21, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 8, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance