Drawing for TRUSTG

USPTO serial 87532482

TRUSTG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELMAN, JESSE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Therese Hendricks

THERESE HENDRICKS POLSINELLI PC100 CAMBRIDGE STREETSUITE 2101BOSTON, MA 02114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for monitoring and tracking of people, objects and pets using location data on a device on the tracked people, objects and petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 20, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 2, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 2, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance