USPTO serial 87532755
ACCESS FABRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCESS FABRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen M. Ganin
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for authorizing access to computer systems and monitoring computer security; computer software that restricts unauthorized access to computer systems as part of information security management systems; computer software for use in administering and managing access to computer servers and user accounts; computer software for enforcing, restricting, tracking and controlling access to databases; security software for sharing sensitive information over an enterprise network and over the Internet; security software for protecting, monitoring, tracking and detecting privileged activity among users of computer resources; security software for detecting suspicious or malicious user activity and cyber-related threats; computer software for providing access control, digital identity authentication, identity management, and computer and network security application tracking and auditing; computer software for issuance of authorization certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for authorizing access to computer systems and monitoring computer security; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software that restricts unauthorized access to computer systems as part of information security management systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enforcing, restricting, tracking and controlling access to databases; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring security software for sharing sensitive information over an enterprise network and over the Internet; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring security software for protecting, monitoring, tracking and detecting privileged activity among users of computer resources; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring security software for detecting suspicious or malicious user activity and cyber-related threats; software as a service(SAAS) services featuring computer software for providing access control, digital identity authentication, identity management, and computer and network security application tracking and auditing; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for issuance of authorization certification; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in administering and managing access to computer servers and user accounts; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for authorizing access to computer systems and monitoring computer security; computer services, namely, providing access control, digital identity authentication, identity management, and computer and network security application auditing; computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; data encryption and decoding services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |