USPTO serial 87534287
ANALYTICALWAYS ROIZING YOUR BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5620089Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2018
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANALYTICALWAYS ROIZING YOUR BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Lee
ELIZABETH LEE LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services for use in the field of retail and wholesale services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for use in retail and wholesale inventory and sales management, customer relationship management (CRM), visual merchandising management and merchandise planning management for networking over global communication networks with automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus, cash registers, calculating machines, and data processing equipment and computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Analyticalways S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Analyticalways S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Analyticalways S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ANALYTICALWAYS ROIZING YOUR BUSINESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |