USPTO serial 87536300
Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Hollander
Andrew Hollander K&L GATES LLPONE NEWARK CENTER, 10TH FLOORNEWARK, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely, downloadable reports in the field of compliance assessment, namely, the future ability of entities in the construction, and utility industries to fulfill contracts on time and within budget; providing a downloadable software application for the purposes of rating, ranking, scoring, assessment and monitoring services in the utility and construction industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Assessment services, namely, business risk assessment services in the nature of assessing future compliance with respect to the ability of entities in the construction, utility industries to fulfill contracts on time and on budget; risk assessment services in the nature of ratings, rankings, scorings and assessments services; business risk assessment analysis services for execution ability ratings, rankings, scorings, warning signs, namely, predictive assessments of compliance with respect to the abilities of entities in the construction, utilities industries to fulfill contracts on time and on budget | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Assessment services, namely, investment risk assessment services in the nature of predicting future compliance with respect to entities in the construction, utility industries to fulfill contracts on time and within budget | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Operation of a website for assessment and project monitoring services in the field of construction and utility industries; construction and industrial project management services relating to the ability of entities to provide services on time and on budget in the utility and construction industries, namely, project monitoring services; construction and industrial project management services in the nature of project monitoring tool services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of online non-downloadable internet based system applications for the purposes of rating, ranking, scoring, assessment and monitoring services in the construction, utility industries with respect to the ability of entities to fulfill contracts on time and on budget | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named Q
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |