Drawing for L O

USPTO serial 87540854

L O

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L O?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank B. Janoski

FRANK B. JANOSKI LEWIS RICE LLCBOX IP DEPARTMENT600 WASHINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 2500ST. LOUIS, MO 63101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Butcher knives; Filleting knives; Serving knives; Hunting knivesACTIVE—
021Pots; pans; household kitchen utensils, namely, kitchen tongs, cooking roasting forks, roasting sticks; cooking forks, serving forks, hot dog cooking forks and marshmallow cooking forks; serving spoons, basting spoons, slotted spoons and mixing spoonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 9, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 19, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance