Drawing for IQUE

USPTO serial 87543469

IQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Brown

Jeffrey H. Brown Michael Best & Friedrich LLP444 W. Lake Street, Suite 3200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Accessories for barbeque grills, namely, electric food blenders and electric knives, all adapted for use with barbeque grillsACTIVE—
009Accessories for barbeque grills, namely, temperature probes, namely, thermometers other than for medical use; accessories for barbeque grills in the nature of meat probes, namely, meat thermometers, all adapted for use with barbeque grillsACTIVE—
011Barbeque grills; grill lights, namely, lighting fixtures for grills; accessories for barbeque grills, namely, rotisseries, convection heaters, electric fans for personal use in grilling by cooling the food being grilled or for cooling persons using or in the vicinity of the grill, smokers, electric roasters, grill racks, rib racks, kabob racks, warming racks, fitted covers for barbeque grills, grates, chafing dishes and utility lighters for lighting grills, all adapted for use with barbeque grillsACTIVE—
021Accessories for barbeque grills, namely, pizza stones, electric brushes for basting, and non-electric kettles, and accessories for barbeque grills in the nature of cooking utensils, namely, wire baskets, and non-electric griddles, all adapted for use with barbeque grillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 13, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 6, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 19, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 29, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 7, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2019INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jul 31, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 31, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 6, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2018EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 31, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance