Drawing for UBEO

USPTO serial 87544048

UBEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADCLIFF, BRENT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UBEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick P. Rogers

PATRICK P. ROGERS PORTER ROGERS DAHLMAN & GORDON2600 VIA FORTUNA #200AUSTIN, TX 78746

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Outsourcing services in the nature of arranging procurement of goods for others in the field of hardware and software for networked communications, and service contracts in connection therewithACTIVEMay 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 25, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 24, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 26, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance