USPTO serial 87544360
GOURMET RECIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOURMET RECIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Suwon-si Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Mason
DIANE MASON LECLAIRRYAN LLP44 MONTGOMERY ST, SUITE 3100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | air conditioners; air sterilizers; electric ovens; electric laundry dryers; electric refrigerators; light emitting diodes lamps; microwave ovens; gas cooking ovens; induction ovens; electric ranges; gas ranges; induction ranges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |