Drawing for ULTRA-POLY

USPTO serial 87544545

ULTRA-POLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-POLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brick Power

BRICK POWER DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR PCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GRP3301 N THANKSGIVING WAY STE 400LEHI, UT 84043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Polymeric additive preparations for use in the manufacture of cementitious toppings for concrete; polymeric additive preparations for use in the manufacture of cementitious toppings for floors; polymeric additive preparations for use in the manufacture of cementitious toppings for pavement; polymeric additive preparations for blending with cementitious toppings for concrete; polymeric additive preparations for blending with cementitious toppings for floors; polymeric additive preparations for blending with cementitious toppings for pavementACTIVE—
019Cementitious construction materials for building purposes including polymeric additives; cementitious construction materials for building purposes used as toppings; cementitious, self-leveling flooring materials for building purposes; polishable cementitious construction materials for building purposes; cementitious floor toppings for bonding to flooring substratesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 9, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance