Drawing for COPPEL

USPTO serial 87544957

COPPEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COPPEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Casimir W. Cook II

CASIMIR W COOK II SCHIFF HARDIN LLPPO BOX 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail department stores; on-line retail department store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 25, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 25, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 12, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance