Drawing for ILLUMIPURE

USPTO serial 87545253

ILLUMIPURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE-RICHARDSON HA, BRITTANY NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ILLUMIPURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

John C. Cain Fleckman & McGlynn8945 Long Point Road, Suite 120Houston, TX 77055UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Light emitting diodes (LEDs); LED and HID light controls; Lighting controls; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for controlling the lights and reporting the condition of the lightsACTIVENov 1, 2016
011Lights, namely, LED lighting fixtures and LED light bulbs; LED Plant Grow Lights; LED Disinfection lights, namely, germicidal lamps for purifying both porous and non-porous surfaces; LED light bulbs; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; Light bulbsACTIVENov 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2019MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 29, 2019ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 20, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 20, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Nov 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 27, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance