USPTO serial 87546522
FULL BROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FULL BROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Advisory services relating to beauty treatment; Beauty consultancy; Beauty consultation; Beauty counselling; Beauty salon services; Beauty salons; Beauty treatment services, namely, cosmetic skin care services, cosmetic hair removal services by means of threading, tweezing, waxing, sugaring and cutting, cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of eyebrow shaping, hair shaping services in the nature of hair cutting, hair threading, hair tweezing, hair waxing and hair sugaring, eyebrow shaping services, hair tinting services, eyebrow tinting services, eyelash tinting services, false eyelash application services, make-up application services and make-up removal services; Consultancy relating to beauty care; Consultancy services relating to personal appearance and beauty care; Health spas, namely, cosmetic skin care services, cosmetic hair removal services by means of threading, tweezing, waxing, sugaring and cutting, cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of eyebrow shaping, hair shaping services in the nature of hair cutting, hair threading, hair tweezing, hair waxing and hair sugaring, eyebrow shaping services, hair tinting services, eyebrow tinting services, eyelash tinting services, false eyelash application services, make-up application services and make-up removal services; Providing information, including online, about hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; Personal care services, namely, medical nursing, health care, hygienic and beauty care; Consultancy relating to cosmetic skin care; Services for the care of the skin, namely, cosmetic skin care services; Cosmetic make-up application services; Make-up application services; Medical spa services, namely, minimally and non-invasive cosmetic and body fitness therapies; Consultancy relating to cosmetic skincare; Manicuring; Pedicure services; Health spa services, namely, cosmetic skin care services, cosmetic hair removal by means of threading, tweezing, waxing, sugaring and cutting, cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of eyebrow shaping, hair shaping services in the nature of hair cutting, hair threading, hair tweezing, hair waxing and hair sugaring, eyebrow shaping services, hair tinting services, eyebrow tinting services, eyelash tinting services, false eyelash application services, make-up application services and make-up removal services; Hair care services; Hair styling; Hair cutting services; Hair colouring services; Hair replacement; Hair implantation; Personal hair removal services; Depilatory waxing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |