USPTO serial 87548378
CRAWFORD GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, JULIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRAWFORD GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Oberdick
David G. Oberdick MEYER UNKOVIC & SCOTT LLP535 SMITHFIELD STREETSUITE 1300PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |