USPTO serial 87549026
MEDINTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDINTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
King of Prussia, PA
King of Prussia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Leonardo
MARK S LEONARDO BROWN RUDNICK LLPONE FINANCIAL CENTERBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Services for providing healthcare business processes, namely, outsource service provider in the field of medical patient chart conversions of paper records to electronic records, electronic scanning of paper healthcare data records, collection and uploading of medical and healthcare data using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect healthcare and medical service data, platform as a service featuring software for healthcare data validation, and quality control of healthcare information | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |