USPTO serial 87549708
CGL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CGL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher G. Lang
Christopher G. Lang Lang Coakley LLC1842 Centre StreetBOSTON, MA 02132UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric and electronic video surveillance installations; cameras, including video, television and surveillance cameras; remote sensors for use in measuring thermal and infrared radiation energy waves; motion detectors; electronic glass break detectors; environmental sensors and detectors for detecting heat, temperature, water, smoke, gas, pressure and movement; biometric identification apparatuses; anti-intrusion alarms; burglar alarms; alarms for the detection of flammable and inflammable gases; smoke alarms; fire alarms; motion sensitive security lights; alarm control panels; security alarm controllers; access control and alarm monitoring systems; remote control units, keypads and control panels for security systems; electronic key fobs as remote control apparatus; locator systems, namely, satellite and radio transmitters and receivers, transponders, and antennas, programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular telecommunications; electronic surveillance products and systems, namely, electronic components of security systems including, sensors, alarms, radio, video and digital signal transmitters, receivers and switches, antennas, intercoms, lasers not for medical use; electronic locks, including, electronic access control systems for interlocking doors; programmable locking systems, consisting of electronic cylindrical locksets and keypads; camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; video and television monitors; mounting devices for cameras and monitors; telephone communication base stations, telephones, and voice and video communication hubs; wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, security systems; computer hardware and computer peripherals; computer software for operating, managing and monitoring security and surveillance systems; computer software for monitoring and tracking movement activity, and environmental conditions, and transmitting electronic messages and data via communications networks; biometric fingerprint digital door locks; electronically operated high security lock cylinders; programmable locking systems, consisting of electronic cylindrical locksets and keypads; user manuals sold as a unit with each of the foregoing goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |