USPTO serial 87549903
Serial No. 87549903
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 87549903?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosaleen H. Chou
ROSALEEN H CHOU KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Providing self-storage facilities for others; Renting and leasing of storage spaces; Storage of goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |