Drawing for THE CRUSHER

USPTO serial 87550193

THE CRUSHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GULIANO, ROBERT N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CRUSHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

BRIAN M Z REECE KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand operated can compactorACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 9, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 9, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 24, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 8, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Oct 18, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 21, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 4, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 4, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 4, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 4, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance