USPTO serial 87550269
PROJECT 43
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2019
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with PROJECT 43?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily R. Billig
Emily R. Billig BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC100 LIGHT STREETBALTIMORE, MD 21202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of broadband-based emergency communications technologies initiatives; Providing public policy information in the field of existing and evolving broadband-based emergency communications technologies for public safety answering points and public safety communications professionals | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2016 |
| 042 | Providing technical research in the field of existing and evolving broadband-based emergency communications technologies for public safety communications professionals; Developing commercial standards for the interoperability of broadband-based emergency communications technologies to assist public safety communication professionals with the impact and effect of broadband-based emergency communications technologies on cybersecurity, governance, operations, workforce, technical and training within the public safety answering points | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Association of Public-Safety-Communications Officials-International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROJECT 43
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |