Drawing for FLAWLESS GLO

USPTO serial 87551397

FLAWLESS GLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAWLESS GLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M. DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREETSUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Appliances for beauty care purposes, namely, electric shavers, hair trimmers and depilatory appliances; Appliances for beauty care purposes, namely, electric and non-electric hand implements used to clean and exfoliate the skin; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Scissors; Hand-operated shears; Razors; Manicure implements, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissorsACTIVE—
021Appliances for beauty care purposes, namely, electric and non-electric hand implements for hair and skin removal; Power-operated brushes used to clean and exfoliate the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance