USPTO serial 87551759
TWISTED SISTERS BATH & BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWISTED SISTERS BATH & BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath beads; Bath bombs; Bath cream; Bath crystals; Bath fizzies; Bath flakes; Bath foam; Bath foams; Bath gel; Bath gels; Bath lotion; Bath melts; Bath milks; Bath oil; Bath oils; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bath pearls; Bath powder; Bath preparations, not for medical purposes; Bath salts, not for medical purposes; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Bathing lotions; Hair butter; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color chalk; Hair conditioners; Hair detangling preparations; Hair fixers; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair highlighting spray; Hair lotion; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling gel; Hair styling spray; Hair texture cream; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair-washing powder; Adhesives for false eyelashes, hair and nails; Aromatic oils for the bath; Baby bubble bath; Bubble bath; Cosmetic bath salts; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Foam bath; Gift baskets containing non-medicated bath preparations and cosmetic preparations; Japanese hair fixing oil (bintsuke-abura); Liquid bath soaps; Mineral salt in the nature of bath salts not for medical purposes; Non-medicated bath preparations; Non-medicated bath salts; Non-medicated bath soap; Non-medicated bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated bubble bath preparations; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated soap in the form of bath toys; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Preparations for setting hair; Shower and bath foam; Shower and bath gel; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair; Styling paste for hair; Waving preparations for the hair; Wax strips for removing body hair | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |