Drawing for PHILADELPHIA MIXING SOLUTIONS MOHR

USPTO serial 87552997

PHILADELPHIA MIXING SOLUTIONS MOHR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NKOJO, RHODA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHILADELPHIA MIXING SOLUTIONS MOHR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline M. Lesser

JACQUELINE M. LESSER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP2929 ARCH STREETCIRA CENTRE, 12TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable reports featuring analysis of industrial mixing equipment, configuration and processes for pump impellers and mixers for commercial and industrial use, impellers and motor drives for mixers, agitators, and aerators and replacement parts for all of the aboveACTIVE—
016Printed reports featuring analysis of industrial mixing equipment, configuration and processes for pump impellers, mixers for commercial and industrial use, impellers and motor drives for mixers, agitators, and aerators and replacement parts for all of the aboveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 28, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 28, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance