USPTO serial 87553194
CARBON BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEGAL, MOLLY DANIELA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARBON BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
Gregory J. Chinlund MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business information in the field of trading of carbon credits; Provision of consumer product information relating to the impact of purchasing, selling, exchanging and trading carbon credits to offset the environmental impact of disposing, or recycling of information technology products | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Trading of carbon dioxide credits, allowances or offsets of others; Commodity exchange services, namely, brokerage and trading of carbon credits to offset the environmental impact of disposing or recycling of information technology products; Charitable fundraising services by means of disposing, refurbishing, reselling, and recycling of computer equipment for the purpose of providing donations to charity; provision of financial information in the field of purchasing, selling, exchanging and trading carbon credits to offset the environmental impact of disposing, or recycling of information technology products; providing a website featuring financial information related to emission reductions, carbon offsets, carbon credits, energy efficiency and energy conservation through the disposing, reusing and/or recycling of information technology products | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Refurbishing of information technology products to offset the environmental impact of disposing or recycling of such products; Providing consulting in the area of refurbishment of computer equipment; Technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the refurbishment of computer equipment; providing a website that features information on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the refurbishment of information technology products | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Providing consulting services in the area of recycling and destruction of computer equipment; Technical support services, namely, technical advice related to recycling and destruction of computer equipment; providing a website that features information on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the recycling or destruction of information technology products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compugen Finance Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named CARBON BANK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |