Drawing for FLUX

USPTO serial 87553253

FLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Serge Anissimoff

SERGE ANISSIMOFF SISKINDS LLP680 Waterloo StreetLondon, Ontario, N6A3V8CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing temporary access to a supercomputer for the purpose of running software programs for enabling automated decision making and traffic managementACTIVE—
039Providing a website featuring information on road and traffic data and information, namely, real time and historical road and traffic data and information, actual and predicted travel time and speed on user defined routes, traffic alerts and warnings and customizable filtering, analysis and reporting of road and traffic data and informationACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring road and traffic data and information, namely, weather information; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to view real time and historical road and traffic data and information, actual and predicted travel time and speed on user defined routes, traffic alerts and warnings and customizable filtering, analysis and reporting of road and traffic data and information; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for real time and historical road and traffic data and information, actual and predicted travel time and speed on user defined routes, weather information, traffic alerts and warnings and customizable filtering, analysis and reporting of road and traffic data and information; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software that enables automated decision making and traffic management; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for enabling automated decision making and traffic managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance